897 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Changes in fish populations in the Lower Canyons of the Rio Grande
The Lower Canyons of the Rio Grande suffer from environmental degradation that has negatively impacted native fish populations and their distributions. Macrhybopsis aestivalis (speckled chub), Notropis jemezanus (Rio Grande shiner), Rhinichthys cataractae (longnose dace) and Cycleptus elongatus (blue sucker) populations appear to have suffered recent declines. Although diminished water quantity is likely an important factor in these declines, related changes in channel morphology precipitated by massive stands of Arundo donax (giant reed) and Tamarix sp. (salt cedar) may also be responsible. These invasive exotics have essentially channelized the river, disrupted normal sediment distribution and reduced shallow, low-velocity habitats. Much of the Lower Canyons of the Rio Grande are devoid of sandy sediment and most riffles are now composed of gravel and cobble.Integrative Biolog
Recommended from our members
An Annotated Checklist of the Freshwater Fishes of Texas, with Keys to Identification of Species
Forty-five families and 247 species of fishes are known to inhabit the freshwaters of Texas. We report on the distribution and status of these fishes and provide a key to their identification. Of the native fishes originally found in Texas, five taxa, Notropis orca (phantom shiner), Notropis simus simus (Rio Grande bluntnose shiner), Cyprinella lutrensis blairi (Maravillas red shiner), Gambusia amistadensis (Amistad gambusia) and Gambusia georgei (San Marcos gambusia) are apparently extinct, and three, Oncorhynchus clarki virginalis (Rio Grande cutthroat trout), Hybognathus amarus (Rio Grande silvery minnow) and Gambusia senilis (blotched gambusia) appear to be extirpated from the state. More than 20 percent of the remaining primary freshwater species appear to be in some need of protection.Integrative Biolog
Recommended from our members
Year 1 report for âConserving Texas Biodiversity: Status, Trends, and Conservation Planning for Fishes of Greatest Conservation Needâ
State Wildlife Grant Program, grant TX T-106-1 (CFDA# 15.634), Contract No. 459125 UTA14-001402Substantive progress was made on all major Project Activities in this first year:
Activity 1. Coordinate and Facilitate Science and Conservation Actions for Conserving Texas Biodiversity - We expanded and strengthened UT-TPWD coordination, transitioning the relationship between these partners into a much more collaborative one than was previously realized. The flow of data between TPWD and the Fishes of Texas Project (supported in part by this project) has become much more bi-directional. Many newly collected TPWD specimens, agency databases, legacy data products and reports, and feedback from resource managers are now beginning to contribute substantively to growth and diversity (now including non-specimen-vouchered records) of data served through the FoTX Projectâs websites. Work on cleaning and normalizing of FoTXâs online specimen-vouchered database continued, and the updated FoTX occurrence and distribution data are being actively used. Most recently they were used by this project, together with expert (TPWD, UT and othersâ) opinions, to develop recommendations on conservation status of native fishes of Texasâ Species of Greatest Conservation Need for TPWDâs consideration in anticipated updates to the Texas Conservation Action Plan. Within two months of this report, a new and substantially larger and improved version of the FoTX website/database and related collection of images, field notes, and ancillary datasets, will be formally announced.
Activity 2. Identify Priority Geographic Management Units for Conserving Fishes of Greatest Conservation Need - We used FoTX data in a systematic conservation area prioritization analysis to identify Native Fish Conservation Areas (NFCAs) for large portions of Texas where such comprehensive planning had not been previously carried out. Updated and new FoTX data for all Texas fish Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) were used in production of newly improved Species Distribution Models for input into this planning process, and the results of the planning exercise have already been integrated by TPWD into management prioritizations of both those species and the resultant NFCAs.
Activity 3. Develop Monitoring and Conservation Plans for Native Fish Conservation Areas - Monitoring and conservation plans were delivered to TPWD for all NFCAs identified in Activity 2.
Activity 4. Conduct Field-Based Surveys Detailed Biodiversity Assessments (i.e. Bioblitzing), and Citizen-Based Monitoring - Field surveys with detailed biodiversity assessments (âbioblitzesâ) and citizen-based monitoring were conducted in three areas selected collaboratively by TPWD and FoTX Project staff from within the identified NFCAs: Nueces River headwaters, Big Cypress Bayou basin, and Village Creek basin. Along with this field effort, FoTX Project staff developed and circulated guidelines and best practices, and provided training for citizen-based monitoring that leverages iNaturalist for capture and reporting of photo-vouchered occurrence records in ways that will help assure scientifically useful data are obtained. All specimens acquired during these field efforts, and from many other routine specimen acquisitions from across the state (1845 total records/jars of specimens), were cataloged in the UT Fish Collection database. From there, these new records will soon be fed into GBIF, VertNet, FishNet2 and other major online data aggregators, including the online Fishes of Texas database.Texas Parks and Wildlife Department; U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceIntegrative Biolog
Kinematic Analysis of Obstacle Clearance During Locomotion
This study investigated the effect of obstacles of different heights on the locomotion of 15 healthy subjects. The following parameters were studied: (1) the distance of the toe and heel markers from the obstacle during toe-off and heel contact, respectively, (2) the minimum clearance distance of the toe and heel markers, and (3) the angular displacements and velocities of the hip, knee, and ankle. Results show significant differences in joint angular kinematics and clearance distances as obstacle height increased. The kinematic and distance differences exhibited both strong linear and non-linear trends. Toe-off distance and heel contact distance did not change significantly with changes in obstacle height
Recommended from our members
Status Assessment and Watershed Planning for Plateau Shiner, Nueces River Shiner, and Nueces Roundnose Minnow in the Upper Nueces River Basin
NOTE: Though this report states "Vouchers of all species collected were preserved, fixed in 10% formalin and preserved in 75% ethanol and placed for curation in the Texas Natural History Collection at the University of Texas at Austin", as of 22 August, 2018, the specimens had not been catalogued in that collection and searches for them by collection staff and the authors failed to find them.The Upper Nueces River Basin is composed of three main tributary systems: the Nueces, Frio, and Sabinal rivers. All three rivers were designated as Ecologically Significant Stream Segments by the Texas Water Development Board in regional water planning. The Texas Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy (Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 2005) and The Nature Conservancy (The Nature Conservancy 2004) have also designated the three rivers as high priorities. Additionally, about 60% of the Edwards Aquifer recharge water comes from the upper portion of the Nueces River basin, making riparian health important for plant, animal, and human communities throughout the region. It is thought riparian integrity in these rivers has declined, posing a threat to priority species and habitats, not to mention human use. One possible indicator of this decline is the apparent decrease in range and abundance of several fish species, notably but not exclusively, the plateau shiner (Cyprinella lepida), Nueces River shiner (Cyprinella sp.), and the Nueces roundnose minnow (Dionda serena). These species are thought to depend on perennial relative flows of clear water, and thus serve as an indicator of hydrologic function and water quality. We provide information on the status and range of these three species and their utility as indicators of hydrological integrity and watershed health. We also provide data that can be useful for a community-based action plan to help maintain the ecological integrity in critical portions of the three river basins.The Nature Conservancy, Austin, TexasIntegrative Biolog
Values of H_0 from Models of the Gravitational Lens 0957+561
The lensed double QSO 0957+561 has a well-measured time delay and hence is
useful for a global determination of H0. Uncertainty in the mass distribution
of the lens is the largest source of uncertainty in the derived H0. We
investigate the range of \hn produced by a set of lens models intended to mimic
the full range of astrophysically plausible mass distributions, using as
constraints the numerous multiply-imaged sources which have been detected. We
obtain the first adequate fit to all the observations, but only if we include
effects from the galaxy cluster beyond a constant local magnification and
shear. Both the lens galaxy and the surrounding cluster must depart from
circular symmetry as well.
Lens models which are consistent with observations to 95% CL indicate
H0=104^{+31}_{-23}(1-\kthirty) km/s/Mpc. Previous weak lensing measurements
constrain the mean mass density within 30" of G1 to be kthirty=0.26+/-0.16 (95%
CL), implying H0=77^{+29}_{-24}km/s/Mpc (95% CL). The best-fitting models span
the range 65--80 km/s/Mpc. Further observations will shrink the confidence
interval for both the mass model and \kthirty.
The range of H0 allowed by the full gamut of our lens models is substantially
larger than that implied by limiting consideration to simple power law density
profiles. We therefore caution against use of simple isothermal or power-law
mass models in the derivation of H0 from other time-delay systems. High-S/N
imaging of multiple or extended lensed features will greatly reduce the H0
uncertainties when fitting complex models to time-delay lenses.Comment: AASTEX, 48 pages 4 figures, 2 tables. Also available at:
http://www.astro.lsa.umich.edu:80/users/philf/www/papers/list.htm
Conservation genetics of cyprinid fishes in the upper Nueces River basin in central Texas
Sequences of the mitochondrial (mt) NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5 gene (ND5) were acquired to assess genetic diversity and female effective population size (Nef) of two forms of Cyprinella (C. lepida and C. sp. cf lepida) and two species of Dionda (D. serena and D. texensis) in headwaters of three rivers in the upper Nueces River basin in central Texas. As documented in prior studies, two divergent clades of haplotypes of mtDNA were found in both genera: one in the Frio and Sabinal rivers, representing C. lepida and D. serena; one in the Nueces River, representing C. sp. cf lepida and D. texensis. Levels of variation in mtDNA from C. lepida in the Sabinal River and D. serena in the Frio and Sabinal rivers were comparable to or considerably lower than values documented for populations of several threatened or endangered cyprinids. Estimates of Nef for C. lepida in the Frio River and C. sp. cf lepida in the Nueces River were low, suggesting that adaptive genetic variation through time may be compromised. Of all populations sampled, only D. texensis in the Nueces River appears at present to be genetically stable demographically. An unexpected finding was two individuals resembling C. lepida in the Frio River with a haplotype referable to C. sp. cf lepida; the origin of these individuals is unknown. Two other individuals resembling C. lepida but with haplotypes of mtDNA referable to C. venusta were found in the Frio River and presumably represent relatively recent hybrids. Results of our study indicate that C. lepida, C. sp. cf lepida, and D. serena in the upper Nueces River basin, especially in the Sabinal River drainage, are at appreciable genetic risk
Recommended from our members
American Eel in Texas â what we do, donât, and need to, know
Copy of the oral presentation made by the first author to the January 2016 meeting of the Texas Chapter of American Fisheries Society in Kerrville, Texas. Presentation is provided in several file formats. Data mapped in the presentation are also included in kml format (Google Earth).American Eel is undoubtedly one of the most studied freshwater fishes of North America. Many recent discoveries have added new insights that re-write important aspects of the âtext bookâ knowledge of the speciesâ complex life history in ways that could have significant impacts on management. Despite all of this new information, debate about the speciesâ conservation status continues, and new threats, such as continued habitat loss and major clandestine fisheries driven by extremely high value in the global market, have further complicated management. Though USFWS recently decided that the species does not merit listing as âEndangered,â in 2012 Canada changed that countryâs assessment of the speciesâ status from âSpecial Concernâ (since 2006) to âThreatenedâ and IUCN upped its classification in 2013 to âEndangered.â Ontario has considered it âEndangeredâ since 2007. All U.S. Atlantic states vowed to work together to produce, in 1999, the American Eel Benchmark Stock Assessment, which mandated each state conduct standardized monitoring of recruitment and later, mandatory catch and effort monitoring. Given all that activity and data generation, it is remarkable that still so little is known about the populations of the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) and its tributary rivers that making any management decisions in that large, neglected part of the speciesâ range is virtually impossible. The Fishes of Texas Project team has been collating and improving the limited and scattered data on occurrences of the species in the region and concludes it important to promote a broad scale (Gulf of Mexico) collaborative community effort to acquire and share data and carefully curated specimens and, hopefully, develop a GOM-wide collaborative research and management plan like that implemented by Atlantic states. Here weâll review the literature and state of knowledge about the species in Texas and GOM, and suggest ways to begin work toward such an effort.University of Texas at AustinIntegrative Biolog
Kinematic analysis of obstacle clearance during locomotion
Abstract This study investigated the effect of obstacles of different heights on the locomotion of 15 healthy subjects. The following parameters were studied: (1) the distance of the toe and heel markers from the obstacle during toe-off and heel contact, respectively, (2) the minimum clearance distance of the toe and heel markers, and (3) the angular displacements and velocities of the hip, knee, and ankle. Results show significant differences in joint angular kinematics and clearance distances as obstacle height increased. The kinematic and distance differences exhibited both strong linear and non-linear trends. Toe-off distance and heel contact distance did not change significantly with changes in obstacle height
Recommended from our members
Discovery of the Mexican Blindcat, Prietella phreatophila, in the U.S., and an update on its rangewide conservation status
presented at the 2017 meeting of the Texas Academy of Science at Mary Hardin Baylor University, Belton, TexasMexican blindcat, Prietella phreatophila, was described in 1954 from a single locality in Northern Coahuila, MĂ©xico. Long listed as endangered by the Mexican federal government, it was listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as a foreign endangered species in 1970, and the most recent (1996) update of its assessment for the IUCN Red List considers it endangered as well. Explorations in the late 1990s discovered many new localities extending nearly to the international border, and a captive population established provided insights into the speciesâ basic biology and behavior. In 2016 the species was discovered in a cave in the Amistad National Recreation Area (ANRA), just north of the RĂo Grande in Texas. The 1970 listing instantly gave the TX population full protection under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. The speciesâ subterranean and mostly inaccessible habitat endows it with extremely low detectability and its actual range is likely broader than physical sampling of specimens has revealed. We review all prior and new knowledge of the species and its habitat to provide an updated international reassessment of its overall conservation status and threats, which most notably include aquifer depletion and contamination in both the Mexican and U.S. portions of its known range. A live captive population of two specimens collected in 1997 in Coahuila and one Texas specimen is now at the San Antonio Zoo, we are working with NPS to further explore ANRA caves and hope eventually to return to Coahuila to more fully update the speciesâ conservation status.Integrative Biolog
- âŠ